12,486
edits
Changes
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
m
'''Can't be rogue'''
In Diablo 3, every character can be a male or female. So I think rogue (which is a pure sisterhood) or amazon cannot be the 5th class. The character could be a ranger (male or female) with good ranged skills, tracking and healing abilities :D If he is able to fight with a mount, that'd be awesome. Maybe requiring a mount is why that 5th class cannot be represented using existing NPC model art.
no edit summary
::Personally, I think that the summoner is very possible, but a little bit of his mandate is weakened by the fact that the [[Witch Doctor]] actually has summons AT ALL. I think we'll DEFINITELY see a ranged non-magic or semi-magic class, much like an Amazon, and the Summoner is having to battle it out with a Melee/Magic user, similar to a Paladin, or similar class... (A [[Dervish]])? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 16:24, 26 February 2009 (CET)
==Can't be rogue==In [[Diablo 3]], every character can be a male or female. So I think [[rogue]] (which is a pure sisterhood) or [[amazon]] cannot be the 5th class. The character could be a ranger (male or female) with good ranged skills, tracking and healing abilities :D If he is able to fight with a mount, that'd be awesome. Maybe requiring a mount is why that 5th class cannot be represented using existing NPC model art. :Being a Rogue doesn't mean being part of the [[Sisterhood of the Sightless Eye ]] per se. --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 18:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC) ::Vipermagi is right. (Sorry guys, added links for easier access) ::Anyone can be a rogue, and the Sisterhood were just nicknamed Rogues anyway. Also, who's to say they did not open it up further as they were all but extinct by [[Andariel]] and [[Blood Raven]]? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 10:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
